In a sentence or two, are you able to give us khodorkovskys thesis
position.
I tried to listen to the radio Svoboda link and it was so bad I couldn't
hear what he was saying. I believe much earlier he came out and stated in a
video that the Severnyj Kavkaz should be part of Russia.what about Krym,
what did he say. Some of the commentators on hromadske Facebook page, are
calling him a Putin Rupor. I don't believe this.
On Monday, 10 March 2014, <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://www.unian.ua/politics/894788-zavtra-yanukovich-
> vistupit-iz-zayavoyu-zmi.html
>
> Yanuk to make a statement tomorrow at Rostov.
>
> Some surmises (could be completely off): Putin sees that most of his plan
> will not pass. So he will give instructions to Aksyonov to have the
> referendum approve option 2: The Crimea as a near (but not quite) sovereign
> entity under its 1992 constitution (renewed) BUT STILL PART OF UKRAINE.
> This will eliminate the "annexation" issue and pacify the UK and the US.
> Remember that in early days Aksyonov recognized the continuing legitimacy
> of Yanuk. This will be revived and "President" Yanuk will continue his
> struggle for "legitimacy". The titushky etc. in Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv
> will receive instructions to shift focus away from Russia to "Yanuk
> legitimacy". This will render the 25 May election very difficult (with
> promoted disorders wherever possible).
>
> What can stop this or nullify it? A quick dissolution of the Crimean
> Parliament, and confirmation of the nullity of the 16 March referendum by
> the Venetian commission (whose decision is expected this Friday March 14).
>
> And so the game will continue. For "a long time" as Khodorkovskyj just
> predicted in today's Kyiv lecture to students...
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 01 2014 - 00:57:57 EST