Crimea under siege - Economist - 1Mar2014

From: Stefan Lemieszewski ([email protected])
Date: Sat Mar 01 2014 - 08:01:55 EST


http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2014/03/russia-and-ukraine
Economist
1Mar2014
Crimea under siege
by A.O. | SIMFEROPOL

NO SHOTS were fired, no announcements made. But over the past 48 hours, Russia has embarked on a brazen military intervention in Crimea, staging a putsch, installing a puppet government and effectively taking the peninsula under its control.

In the early hours of February 28th, well equipped and professional-looking men in camouflage uniforms with assault rifles took over two Crimean airports, set up road blocks, hemmed Ukraine’s navy into the Balaklava bay near Sevastopol and established control over the local television tower. The men displayed no insignias and did not answer questions. But by the evening armoured personnel-carriers with Russian markings were moving from Sevastopol, where Russia has a naval base, to Simferopol, in the centre of the peninsula, where several military cargo-planes were reported to be landing at a nearby Russian military base. The airspace over Crimea was closed. All this was done swiftly and silently.

Alexander Turchinov, the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament and the acting president, said that Russia has started an “undisguised aggression against our country…Under the cover of military exercises they [the Russians] brought their military forces into Crimea and are trying to blockade the positions of Ukrainian military forces.”

Mr Turchinov said that Russia was following the same script it had used during a war with Georgia in 2008, which resulted in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two breakaway territories, being occupied by Russian forces. Then, Russia issued people in South Ossetia and Abkhazia with Russian passports, and when fighting broke out between South Ossetia and Georgia, said it needed to protect the lives of its citizens. By contrast, there has been no fighting in Crimea so far. Russia’s de facto invasion has instead prompted parallels with the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.

Russian television channels, which are widely watched in Crimea, provided propaganda to give cover to what increasingly looks like a well-prepared military takeover of the peninsula. It is happening on the 60th anniversary of Nikita Khrushchev's transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine, when both were part of the Soviet Union. Whether Russia's ultimate goal this time is to annex Crimea or simply to gain leverage over Ukraine's new government is unclear.

A day earlier, on February 27th, unidentified men had taken over the parliament in Simferopol, disarming and kicking out the local police. The gunmen then let in the local deputies, took away their mobile telephones and oversaw the voting in of a new government led by Sergei Aksenov, the leader of the Russian Unity party. The parliament then called a referendum on Crimea’s autonomy. Valentina Samar, an investigative reporter in Crimea, says the vote was rigged.

Mr Aksenov, nicknamed the “Goblin”, declared himself in charge of Crimea's armed forces, and told them not to respond to orders from Kiev. He has also announced that the Berkut—the quad of riot police that brutalised protestors in Kiev's Independence Square, and which was disbanded by the new government—is to be restored under his command. Russia said it had started issuing Berkut officers with Russian passports. Mr Aksenov then asked Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president, for help in maintaining order in Crimea. Russia’s own parliament is due to meet next week to discuss a simplified procedure to integrate new territories.

Arseny Yatseniuk, Ukraine’s prime minister, appealed to the Kremlin to “stop provoking civil and military conflict. We demand that the Russian Federation recalls its troops.” The majority of Crimea's 2m inhabitants are ethnic Russians, but some 13% are Crimean Tartars, who suffered mass killings under early Soviet rule and mass deportations under Stalin. They returned to Crimea after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and most have no desire to be brought back into Russia. “This is an unannounced and open aggression against the territory of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, which is supposed to be a guarantor of its sovereignty,” says Refat Chubarov, the leader of Crimea's Tartars. According to the Budapest agreement of 1994, which was signed by Ukraine, Russia, America and Britain, Ukraine gave up its nuclear arms in exchange for security guarantees from the co-signatories.

Russia has launched its operation at a time when Ukraine is particularly weak, still trying to form a government after the overthrowing of Viktor Yanukovych, its thuggish former president. Mr Yanukovych has emerged in Russia, where on February 28th he gave a news conference insisting that he was still the president of Ukraine.

In Simferopol, a few dozen men and women came out on the streets to protest against what they described as a neo-Nazi and NATO-sponsored government in Kiev. To keep up their spirits, an elderly lady acted as a DJ, singing along to 1930s Soviet songs that were played in the background. But as unidentified soldiers took up their positions in the streets, most of Simferopol’s 250,000 residents stayed indoors.

Picture credit: AFP

=============================



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 01 2014 - 00:56:25 EST