Your point is well taken. I do not know when this lustration will happen.
Maybe never.
But this raises the other issue: should a president also be running a
company or corporation.
Lyashko often speaks in very un nuanced terms, but he is a patriot, I
think. He also comes from the lower depths, having grown up in an
orphanage, if I am not mistaken. So, he suspects where the wealth was
obtained.
On Saturday, 29 March 2014, Serbyn Roman
<[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
> Lyashko's argumentation is rather primitive. All candidates should be put
> under the magnifying glass in a good lustration process. If Poroshenko
> proves to be a crook then he should be barred from the candidacy, if he is
> not a crook, then obviously his millions (billions) only prove his talents.
> Yanukovich started as a small crook before he got into politics.
>
> This was why I raised the question of ethics in politics, especially now
> pertinent to presidential candidates.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/29/14, *Francine Ponomarenko * <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> http://24tv.ua/home/showSingleNews.do?oligarhi_pri_vladi__zlo__lyashko_pro_poroshenka&objectId=426853
>
>
> Lyashko, Has a point about oligarchs running Ukraine.
>
>
> My hope: one day Sadovyj becomes president, but he said he is not ready
> and says he has stuff to do in Lviv. The rest of Ukraine may not be ready
> for him yet either, but maybe next time round.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 01 2014 - 00:59:44 EST