I heard Ohryzko give a very good outline of this, and also Tarasiuk,who was
excellent. He had worked on it for two years.
Both felt that the two segments should be signed together. They said
clauses could have been put in, but this way, there will be more waiting to
sign the economic agreement.
On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, <[email protected]> wrote:
> This separation seemed to have received an adequate explanation (I forget
> the link). This is because the Yanuk regime when preparing the association
> agreement had only made specific demands on those aspects of the Ukrainian
> economy from which they profited, and "forgot" about the rest. So in that
> version the economic side was very inconvenient for Ukraine. This is to be
> reviewed and changed.
>
> Quoting Francine Ponomarenko <[email protected]>:
>
> I agree. Putin will not go for this. Look shortly when they sign the
>> association, it isn't even the full pkg. just the political segment. This
>> is a joke. How can the two components be separated, political and
>> economic.
>> Seems Italy or Spain ( don't know which)wanted this in order not to
>> disrupt
>> their trade with Russia. I guess this better than nothing. But Ukraine
>> should push the Eu more on this, and fast.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I did a search thru the internet
>>>
>>> Basically Fule only stated that Ukraine "could join the EU" as a
>>> full member (i.e. they are considering opening up the enlargement
>>> of the EU)). That is not something offered for tomorrow or next
>>> week but down the road -- aka if Ukraine survives.
>>>
>>> Believe me Putin will not allow that to happen. He will invade
>>> to stop it.
>>>
>>> Then EU will huff & puff & finger wag some more. :O
>>>
>>>
>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yatseniuk has already replied in his speech.
>>> >
>>> > Quoting Francine Ponomarenko <[email protected]
>>> <javascript:;>
>>> >:
>>> >
>>> > > Fifth column will be busy as ever
>>> > > I agree with yurij Lutsenko who said today, that this opportunity
>>> must
>>> not
>>> > > be missed and Uk. Officially should respond asap to Fule. This will
>>> be a
>>> > > chance to turn to a European future away from an asiatic one.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, Anubis <[email protected]
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Euromaidanpr <https://www.facebook.com/euromaidanpr>
>>> > >> F=C3=BCle offers to accept Ukraine in EU
>>> > >>
>>> > >> European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood
>>> Policy
>>> > >> Stefan Fule believes that due to the situation in Ukraine EU may
>>> consider
>>> > >> an issue on enlargement.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The European Commission confirms its offer on admission of Ukraine
>>> into
>>> > >> the EU, Deutsche Welle reports.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> "If we want to change this part of Eastern Europe that faced the
>>> recent
>>> > >> events, we should use the most powerful instrument of the policy,
>>> which EU
>>> > >> has =E2=80=93 it is enlargement. It has unprecedented efficient and
>>> stabilizing
>>> > >> force=E2=80=9D, - said European Commissioner for Enlargement and
>>> European
>>> > >> Neighbourhood Policy =C5=A0tefan F=C3=BCle in an interview to Die
>>> Welt German
>>> > >> newspaper.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> unian.info
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> InfoUkes Inc. Gerald William Kokodyniak
>>> Suite 185, 3044 Bloor Street West Webmaster InfoUkes Inc.
>>> Etobicoke, Ontario [email protected]
>>> <javascript:;>
>>> Canada M8X 2Y8 http://www.infoukes.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 01 2014 - 00:58:30 EST